- properties
- compression strength
- 300 psi to 1800 psi
- coef. of friction
- .0050 to .015 -- pounds of drag per pound of load
- with snow cover it is much higher
- density
- types
- hard black ice
- 8 deg F to 20 deg F
- 20 deg F to 33 deg F
- 34 deg F to 36 deg F
- snow ice
- 8 deg F to 20 deg F
- 20 deg F to 32 deg F
- 33 deg F to 38 deg F
- shell ice
- slush ice
- snow cover
- light fluff - less than .2 inches
- light density snow less than .5 inches
- light density snow - .5 inches to 2.0 inches
- moderate density snow - .5 inches to 1.5 inches
- hoar frost or rime ice
design . analysis . optimization . tuning . race strategy . rules . ice . clubs . venues
Sunday, August 31, 2014
ice
Sunday, August 24, 2014
model of friction on ice with runner
runner tip ice contact
- assume for this discussion that the ice is hard, smooth, and black at 28 degree F
- an extremely sharp "v" shaped tip
- face angle is between 105 degrees and 85 degrees
- sharpened and smoothly sanded up to 600+ grit sandpaper
- runner is held in chock or pillow blocks so that under normal sailing conditions it is perpendicular to the ice
- the crown along the profile allow a smooth entry into the ice while the tip is sliding forward
- with a sharp tip like this the pressure on the ice is always sufficient to dig into the ice
- in the digging process the extreme tip of the runner tears apart the chemical bonds of the crystalline structure in the ice
- little chucks of torn out ice get trapped under the face of the runner
- a groove is formed in the ice at the face of the runner
- some chucks are ground into a smooth dust and melt under the runner face
- larger chucks are moved out of the groove as spoil outside of the groove
- depth of the groove increases with
- weight of (boat, skipper, induced wing lift)
- shorter runner
- smaller face angle
- sharper runner tip
simplistic theory of friction between two different materials
- consult a table that lists the known coefficient of friction between the two materials
- for example copper on steel
- static coefficient -
- dynamic coefficient
marble packing model of friction (theoretical)
- hypothetical composite surface
- base of the surface
- perfectly flat steel plate 1.5 miles square
- steel plate is very thick and does not flex
- small steel marbles
- marbles are machines perfectly round
- diameter of a marble is .001 inches
- layer 1 construction
- one row of steel balls lined up perfectly straight across the back edge of the flat steel plate
- number of balls in row: 1000 * 12 * 5280 * 1.5 = 95,040,000 balls
- the next row of balls is offset by .0005 inches and placed tight against the preceding row
- the process is repeated row by row until the whole layer of the base is filled with balls
- the top surface of the layer is totally flat
- a magical welding process welds each ball to its neighbors at their point of contact
- layer 2 construction
- the same process as layer one except each row of balls lays in the groove created by layer 1
- a magical welding process is used to weld the balls in layer 2 to each other
- the same magical welding process welds layer 2 balls to layer 1 balls
- layers 3 through layer 1000
- same process as layer 2
- lubrication of balls
- a mysterious process applies a very slippery viscous material to the surface of all balls
- the lubricated surface maintains under the sliding load of a steel runner
- hexagonal close packing
- the above layout of marbles is called hexagonal close packing
- each marble in a layer touches 6 adjacent marbles in the same layer
- each marble in a layer touches 3 marbles in the above layer and 3 marbles in the below layer
- in total each marble touches 12 other marbles
- Close packing of equal spheres on Wikipedia
- depth of 1000 layers is approx .74 inches
- experiment A:
- a steel plate of 36 inches long by 3/8" wide rides on the top surface of the marbles
- the steel plate is lightly loaded with weight
- plate is pulled in a forward direction at 40 mph
- experiment A: results
- plate will slide smoothly over the marble surface as it contacts the slippery material on a certain number of surface marbles
- as the plate contacts the marbles they will bend slightly but not deform
- in this bending process there is some energy lost which is called hysteresis loss
- the hysteresis loss is a direct function of the weight on the runner and is caused by the heat generated in the flexing process
- a second loss is encountered which is skin friction
- skin friction can be thought of as the capillary attraction between the slippery fluid on the marble and the steel plate as it dragged forward
- skin friction is strictly a function of the area of the plate with the weight on the plate having no impact
- in this case the area is: 36 in. x .375 in. = 13.5 square in.
- experiment B:
- now assume the weight on the steel plate is slowly increased
- experiment B: results
- at some point the weight on the marbles will great enough that the glue joint between the marbles will fracture and some marbles will be dislodged
- when the joint is broken, energy is lost, with this friction called fracture loss
- after the fracture loss, there are dislodged marbles which must moved out of the path of the runner - this loss is called transport loss
- runner friction is a sum of:
- hysteresis loss
- friction loss caused when an object rides over the surface of hard ice without digging into the ice
- the flex in the ice crystals generates heat which translates into energy loss
- think of a friction less bearing on a large steel wheeled vehicles that is pulled along over a thick steel plate
- here the steel wheel does not dig into the steel plate, but there is still friction from the plate have to flex ever so slightly as the wheel moves above
- skin friction loss
- friction loss caused by molecules of (water/water vapor) which are dragged along between the ice and the runner
- fracture loss
- friction loss caused by the fracture of the chemical bonds between ice crystals
- transport loss
- energy consumed in moving fractured particles of ice away from the runner groove
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
optimize parameters
call to solution algorithms to optimize on various parameters
- runner_tip_radius (grid)
- weight (parm1) [fibbo]
- side_slop (parm2) [fibbo]
- lap_time
- upwind_vmg [fibbo] (35 deg to 85 deg)
- zero force [fibbo] (1.25*wind to 3.5*wind)
- downwind_vmg [fibbo] (95 deg to 165 deg
- zero force [fibbo] (1.25*wind to 4.5*wind)
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
dummy post
Tech Articles
Tech Web Sites
Photo Albums
Clubs
Classes
Forums
Miscellaneous
Poem: Iceboat Fever - Archie Call
- Tuning Guide - Ron Sherry - Composite Concepts
- You Tube Video - Ron Sherry talks DN iceboating
- The physics of sailing - John Kimball
- High performance sailing - Frank Bethwaite
- Float your boat - Mark Denny
- Downwind faster than the wind
- Downwind faster than the wind - Video
- Directly upwind and downwind faster than wind - Video
- Putting numbers on Iceboat Performance - Bob Dill
- Performance characteristics of Iceboats by Peter McCrary: Sailing Scuttlebutt in 1974
- Ken Smith - Collective wisdom of DN iceboat.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forces_on_sails
- WB-Sails: Effect of side bend on the mast
Tech Web Sites
Photo Albums
Clubs
- Four Lakes: Iceboat.org
- Green Lake:Green Lake Ice Yacht Club
- Minnesota: Minnesota Ice Sailing Association
- Oskosh
- Maine
- Conn
- Gull Lake
- Toledo
- Northern Michigan
Classes
- DN: dnamerica.org
- Renegade
- Side by Side
- Skeeter
- Stern Steer
Forums
Miscellaneous
Poem: Iceboat Fever - Archie Call
Monday, August 18, 2014
Introduction to mathematical model
- aerodynamic wing forces
- lift from the wing
- drag from the wing
- induced drag from wing
- factors that influence aero wing forces
- apparent wind angle
- area of the wing
- aspect ratio of wing
- camber of the wing
- bending of the mast
- mast thickness
- batten thickness and shape
- wing rake
- wing side slop
- boom angle to boat centerline
- tip shape wing top
- gap between boom and fuselage
- aerodynamic drag of boat components
- fuselage, plank, springboard, skipper, runners, rigging
- factors that influence aero drag of components
- frontal area of component that sees the apparent wind
- streamlining of component
- runner friction
- forward sliding friction
- lateral resistance friction
- excess resistance caused by
- torque mismatch
- steering runner actions initiated by skipper
- ice surface not strong enough for given side pressure
- factors that influence runner friction
- weight of boat and skipper
- lift from wing
- coef. of friction of ice
- snow cover
- runner length
- runner width
- facet angle
- tip sharpness
- smoothness of runner tip
- straightness of the runner tip grind
- lack of hollows in runner tip grind
- runner camber
- lead in front profile
- lead out rear profile
- thermal conductivity of runner
- air temperature
- roughness of ice
- looseness in steering system
- wobble in chocks or pillow blocks
- tightness of runners in chocks
- misalignment of runners
- runner plank crown
- stiffness of runner plank
- constraints in the model
- hiking limit
- maximum lift that the boat can tolerate
- when this limit is exceeded the boat will hike up about the front runner and the leeward runner
- factors influencing hiking limit
- height of wing
- plank length
- fuselage length
- springboard length
- attachment position of plank to fuselage
- side slop
- rake
- sail hoist
- runner side force limit
- maximum lateral side force that the runners can tolerate
- when this limit is exceeded the runner(s) will side sideways at right angles to line of boat travel
- factors influencing runner side force limit
- weight on rear runners
- weight on front runner
- runner facet angle
- runner tip sharpness
- hardness of ice
Saturday, August 16, 2014
model variables
variables used in the mathematical model
- boat
- boatVel //boat speed (MPH)
- boatAng //angle of boat to true wind (DEG) ie. beam reach = 90.
- wind
- windVel //wind speed (mph)
- massDensityAir //density (.0023 pounds/cf)
- appWindAng //apparent wind angle (degrees)
- appWindVel //apparend wind speed (mph)
- ice
- race course
- wing
- runners
- platform
- skipper
- parasitic aero drag
- weight
- performance measures
- specialty analysis
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Golden rectangle search
solve for one variable
- golden rectangle search
- fastest search algorithm to find the minimum of unimodal function
- assume the function is: y = f(x)
- tau = (1. + sqrt(5.))/2 ; golden rectangle constant of 1.61803
- lower bound = x1
- higher bound = x4
- minimum lies between x1 and x4
- one interation
- set x3 = (x4 - x1) * tau
- set x2 = x1 + (x4 - x3)
- evaluate y1 = f(x1), y2 = f(x2), y3 = f(x3), y4 = f(x4)
- eliminate x1 if
- y3 gt y2
- eliminate x4 if
- y2 gt y3
- each iteration reduces the interval to 61.8 % of its original interval
- reduction factor after n intervals
- 1 = 61.8 %
- 5 = 9.0 %
- 10 = .81 %
- 15 = .073 %
- 20 = .006 %
- 25 = .00059 %
- 30 = .000053 %
- 15 intervals is OK for most solutions
- 10 intervals is sufficient for rough solutions
- 20 intervals is plausible for precise solutions
- number of function calls = (number of intervals + 3)
- nested golden rectangle search
- nesting of the search is needed to solve multiple things at once
- for example: solve for
- weight between 450 pounds and 600 pounds
- mast side slop between 5 degrees and 20 degrees
- lap time for the optimum VMG courses (upwind and downwind)
- boat angle between 10 degrees and 80 degrees upwind
- boat angle between 100 degrees and 170 degrees downwind
- boat speed between (.5 * TrueWindSpeed) and (5 * TrueWindSpeed)
- total function calls = (10 + 3){weight} * (10 * 3){slop} * 2{Upwind-Downwind} * (12 + 3){VMG} * (15 *3){SPEED}
- total function calls = 76,050 for above solution
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
runner length thought experiment
Thought Experiments:
- a thought experiment involves thinking about a hypothetical situation which has a tangential relationship to iceboating
- by thinking about the situation you gain valuable insight into a technical matter
- for example: we are trying to analyze why sharp longer runners have better lateral resistance than sharp shorter runners
- constants for both long and short runners
- hard black ice at 30 deg F
- 90 degree face angle
- runners are stoned to very smooth straight edge with a 600 grit
- 500 pounds of weight on special sled (runners plus sled)
- two runners on the sled mounted in friction less pillow blocks
- runners are separated by 20 inches on the sled
- a wizard is pulling the slid forward at 50 MPH
- think about Runner A:
- traits
- runner that is 40" long
- very little crown
- 90 deg facet
- stoned to a very sharp tip
- smooth hard black ice with temp of 30 deg F
- weight on the runners = 550 pounds
- the runner digs a groove into the hard black ice
- the depth of this groove is a function of the runner length and the hardness of the ice
- friction force of runner acting in opposite direction to boat travel is about (.01 * weight) on the runners, or 5.5 pounds
- the .01 is called coef. friction of steel on ice
- friction force at right angles to the runners is about (.75 * weight), or about 412 pounds of lateral resistance
- this force is much higher than forward resistance because the tip of the runner is tearing up the ice along the whole runner edge as it is pulled sideways
- in this tearing up process the tip is slicing into the bonds of the ice crystals and separating the chemical bonds
- most of the tearing up process is going on at the extreme tip of the runner
- once a little bit of ice is torn up at the extreme tip it is easily pushed up the face of the groove in the ice
- the 412 pounds of side bite amounts to 10.3 pounds per inch of runner length (i.e. 412/40 = 10.3)
- now think about Runner B:
- traits
- everything is the same as Runner A:, except the length is only 20" long
- the coef. of lateral resistance is going to be similar to the longer runner
- the runner tip is digging in twice as deep because there is twice as much weight per inch on the runner tip
- each inch of the shorter runner must dig up twice as much ice as each inch of the longer runner
- if we assume the side bite of the shorter runner is 412 pounds then the side bite per inch of runner length = 412/20 = 20.6 pounds
- as it gouges out a portion of the ice the whole ice structure higher up is weakened
runner goals
Goals of the runner
- forward sliding friction
- want minimum forward sliding resistance on the ice
- lateral resistance
- desire sufficient lateral resistance to prevent slipping sideways out of runner groove on the ice
- turning ability
- ability of runner(s) to easily turn out of groove during tacking, rounding, or normal steering maneuvers by the skipper
design parameters of the runner
- face angle (approx. 90 deg)
- tip sharpness (expressed as a very small radius of the very tip)
- runner length
- runner crown
- thickness of the runner
- height of runner (dist. up to the lowest portion of any stiffening element)
- thermal conductivity
- hardness of the metal
- grain in the metal
minimum forward sliding resistance
- low thermal conductivity
- minimum hardness
- minimum tip sharpness
- maximum face angle
- quality of sharpening and stoning at the tip (no hollows, or burrs)
- long runner length
- minimum crown in runner
- if snow cover
- want minimum thickness
- may want shorter runner length
- appropriate temperature wax on sides of runner
maximum lateral resistance
- maximum tip sharpness
- minimum face angle
- long runner length
- minimum crown in runner
turning ability
- minimum runner length
- maximum runner crown
counter acting goals
- sliding resistance, lateral resistance, and turning ability all counter act each other in the appropriate design parameters
- lateral resistance
- goal: only have sufficient resistance to cover most points of sailing -- but not to excess
- if you try to cover 100% of all sailing situations then your forward sliding resistance will be too high in general
- for example a hollow ground runner would do the trick on lateral resistance, but it would increase forward sliding resistance to intolerable levels
- the skipper can adjust their sailing strategy and tuning to somewhat deal with with low lateral resistance
- pinch up the middle of the course
- take wide hitch at leeward mark
- add side slop to mast
- too little lateral resistance and you will side slip
- too much lateral resistance will increase sliding resistance
- turning ability
- goal: only have sufficient crown to provide adequate turning ability
- too little crown creates excess drag while turning
- too much crown reduces lateral resistance and increases sliding resistance
- forward sliding friction
- goal: given that you have covered lateral resistance and turning ability, then go all out to minimize sliding resistance with what is left
Monday, August 11, 2014
Forces
Forward forces
- lift from the wing
Rearward forces
- form drag from the wing
- skin drag from the wing
- induced drag from the wing
- runner friction due to regular weight of boat
- added runner friction due to wing lift
- parasitic aero drag due to boat compents
Performance measures
- Boat speed
- boat angle
- VMG
- jump start speed
- optimum upwind boat angle
- upwind time
- downwind time
- tacking loss
- downwind hitch gain
- percent time while at hiking limit
- intermediate lap times
- starting lap time
- finish lap time
Sunday, August 10, 2014
Outline1
column 1 | column 2 | column 3 | column 3 |
---|---|---|---|
components | velocity made good | apparent wind | wind |
apparent wind | iceboat vs. sailboat | racing rules | acceleration |
static vs. dynamic | runners | aero drag | ice |
hiking | points of sailing | forces | snow |
wing lift | |||
side slip | stern steer | ||
solution techniques | grid search | binary search | fibbonacci search |
parallel tangents (PARTAN) | |||
components | platform | wing | runners |
skipper | steering | rigging | fuselage |
plank | springboard | mast | boom |
sail | blocks | sheet line | fore stay |
side stay | framing stay | diamond stay | hound |
MasterOutline | |||
............................... | ............................ | .......................... | ........................ |
Saturday, August 9, 2014
Iceboat vs. sailboat
differences
- sailboat in displacement mode
- must move the water aside leading to a speed limit that follows the square root of the water line length
- sailboat in skimming mode
- catamarans, c-scows, racing dingies
- sailboat with foils (ie. Americas Cup 2014)
Static vs. Dynamic
Static analysis
- wind speed and direction is constant
- boat is operating at constant velocity
- all forces on boat are at steady state
- race course is of unlimited length
- tacking is instantaneous
- mark rounding is instantaneous
- boat is not hiking
- ice conditions are constant
- boat heading is unchanged
- boom angle is constant
- fairly easy to compute
- not realistic, nor representative in real world racing
Dynamic analysis
- wind speed can vary in intensity and direction
- boat can be accelerating or decelerating
- race course is size limited
- real world tacking is dynamic and complex
- what are practical alternatives to deal with hiking
- how to avoid runner slip
- how much time is lost by not sailing a hitch at downwind mark in heavy air
Friday, August 8, 2014
Apparent wind
The apparent wind is the resultant wind that the iceboat experiences as a result of the real wind coupled with the wind generated by the speed of the boat itself.
Thought experiment A:
Thought experiment B:
Thought experiment A:
- there is no real wind
- a wizard pushes the boat due north at 10 MPH
- the apparent wind is 10 MPH coming directly from due north
Thought experiment B:
- there is a 10 MPH real wind coming from true north
- a wizard pushes the boat due east at 10 MPH
- the apparent wind is now comprised of two components
- real wind of 10 MPH from the north
- boat generated wind of 10 MPH coming from the east
- the resultant apparent wind is a vector directed over the port side of the boat at 45 degrees
- the magnitude of the apparent wind is the sqrt(10*10 + 10*10), or the sqrt(200), which equals 14.14 MPH
Thought experiment C:
- the real wind of speed W is coming from the north
- the boat is angled at T degrees to the real wind and is traveling at speed B
- the apparent wind has speed V
- the apparent wind has an angle of A to the boat
- from trigonometry
- V = sqrt((B+W*cos(T))**2 + (W*sin(T))**2)
- A = atan(W*sin(T)/(B+W*cos(T))
Significance of apparent wind:
- the iceboat generally travels at speeds that are in excess of 3 times the real wind
- the multiple of real wind speed generates high apparent wind speeds which in turn generates a large amount of lift in the wing
- the apparent wind angle is quite small which allow the iceboat to point much higher than a typical sailboat
Points Of Sailing
- start
- upwind leg
- downwind leg
- port tack
- starboard tack
- windward mark rounding
- leeward mark rounding
- finish
- sailing the diamonds
- pinching up the middle
- sailing your own race
Platform
- flexes on the plank and springboard to ride smoothly over the ice
- is the righting moment to counteract hiking produced by wing lift
- overall size and weight determine how much vertical wing area is practical
Major components of the platform
- fuselage - strongest and stiffest component that carries the whole load
- plank - supports the rear runners and flexes dynamically on the ice
- springboard - extends the platform and also flexes
- skipper - sailor, whose weight of skipper is an integral factor
components
column 1 | column 2 | column 3 | column 3 |
---|---|---|---|
platform | fuselage | plank | springboard |
chocks | runners | wing | blocks |
boom | runners | skipper | sail |
mast | sheet line | side stays | fore stay |
framing stay | rigging | foot pedals | tiller |
winch | jam cleat | halyard | hound |
mast diamond | bob stay | ||
Menu | |||
............................... | ............................ | .......................... | ....................... |
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)